lol
This commit is contained in:
parent
429b59b2b3
commit
f3618f1648
1 changed files with 7 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -69,17 +69,19 @@ Thoughts
|
||||||
- the meaning of `true` and existence of methods.
|
- the meaning of `true` and existence of methods.
|
||||||
- undefined behaviour and `true`?
|
- undefined behaviour and `true`?
|
||||||
- how does this relate to the denotation stuff from before?
|
- how does this relate to the denotation stuff from before?
|
||||||
* formal rules and the sequent calculus
|
|
||||||
|
# formal rules and the sequent calculus
|
||||||
|
Check formalities.md.
|
||||||
- simple rules
|
- simple rules
|
||||||
- type constructor rules
|
- type constructor rules
|
||||||
- recursion and cyclic proofs
|
- recursion and cyclic proofs
|
||||||
* next steps?
|
* next steps?
|
||||||
- implementation: sequent calculus based subtyping decider
|
|
||||||
- simple rules, should be fairly simple
|
|
||||||
- type constructors, straightforward hopefully
|
|
||||||
- recursion and cyclic proofs... `¯\_(ツ)_/¯`
|
|
||||||
- formals:
|
- formals:
|
||||||
- formulate theorems
|
- formulate theorems
|
||||||
- if we use semantic subtyping, isn't it enough to
|
- if we use semantic subtyping, isn't it enough to
|
||||||
prove subtyping sound with regards to set denotation?
|
prove subtyping sound with regards to set denotation?
|
||||||
- specify term language?
|
- specify term language?
|
||||||
|
- implementation: sequent calculus based subtyping decider
|
||||||
|
- simple rules, should be fairly simple
|
||||||
|
- type constructors, straightforward hopefully
|
||||||
|
- recursion and cyclic proofs... `¯\_(ツ)_/¯`
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue